W.A.R. (1996 mix)
|
|
This song was found on a long lost tape from 1996 or 1997.
Only spiced up with some EQ + limiting.
Yeah it is weird.
I used one of the factory performances of the Roland JV1080 and an Amiga 4000 with a MIDI software, and came up with this.
Blame the timing problems on the MIDI interface that I brought for my Amiga back then.
It seemed as if on occasion, the tempo sync signal didn't get through properly. I was lost as what to do.
But wrong notes? Sorry, no.
Only spiced up with some EQ + limiting.
Yeah it is weird.
I used one of the factory performances of the Roland JV1080 and an Amiga 4000 with a MIDI software, and came up with this.
Blame the timing problems on the MIDI interface that I brought for my Amiga back then.
It seemed as if on occasion, the tempo sync signal didn't get through properly. I was lost as what to do.
But wrong notes? Sorry, no.
Hits - 291 overall, 1 today
|
Reviews
|
No reviews available. Are you up to the challenge of writing the first review?
Waz shouts: Back in 1996, this would have been good. But not now. It just seems a bit thin on the ground even though there's some good ideas there.
Makke shouts: As fun as it is to hear a "new" 10 year old remix, this is just not good enough. Out of sync and tune at times, I find this hard to enjoy. Skitz shouts: Touch SID to tackle but this is not the way... LMan shouts: Weird! Dan shouts: Ok, its ten years old and back then it would have got a high result, but the tune is sorely lacking in every department
Tas shouts: Can't enjoy this; too many imperfections. Chris Abbott shouts: 'Tis mucho weird. Actually, if I had been presented with this for Back in Time 1 I wouldn't have used it, so it wouldn't have really worked then either. eliot shouts: It's not that bad compared to some of "todays" entries... infamous shouts: A bit too wobbly for my liking im afraid and very 2000 remix64 im afraid. romeo_knight shouts: Sounds amateurish in any way, sorry. Bad notes all over the place. EDIT: Yes! There's almost no chord change that works like in the SID - even if this is done on purpose it sounds horrible to me. Sorry, again. chilli_uk shouts: Probably one of my fav sids and very very under rated and probably one of the hardest to cover as no one has really tried. Yes its good for 1996 and nice to hear it. Would love to hear the 2007 version - good luck! A little watery for me mata123 shouts: Nice one
drm shouts: It may be 10 years old & pre-soft synth but I like it. It's got character. I can def hear an influence from the X Files there. omoroca shouts: Annoyingly boring! anaconda shouts: Wtf is this?
