And no, a direct download feed won't happen. So don't ask.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Or to an RSS reader. Which means that rather than zoom around the various sites to check for new content you have the reader pull in headlines from the sites you subscribe to. Not to mention rendering headlines from cluttered news pages like The Registers in a readable fashion.Matrix wrote:"Real Simple Syndication", its a kind of easy XML for bringing webcontent to your webpages
Wrong. All you have to do is write the XML according to the publicly available RSS specifications and make it available through your site.Matrix wrote:you can send or recieve RSS feeds, but you gotta pay for sending it, far as i know theres no free version as yet... not that id know how to set it up anyway....
Wrong again. While loadsa people linking to your RSS feed on their webpages would of course increase the google rank for the feed, just having end-users add your feed to their RSS readers doesn't increase Googles awareness of your site as it never sees that traffic. PostNuke (used on soundwavers.com) and other site engines that have the ability to incorporate RSS feeds all do so by including the contents of said RSS feeds in the HTML that they produce - so once again; Google isn't aware of it.Matrix wrote:The basic idea is that regular fresh content bring the google spider bot more often and increases your google rank.
If you could see that 3 ppl ticked "what is RSS on the poll" why didnt you explain sooner... ? It's quite arrogant to expect everybody knows what you know."I strongly suggest that you read up on the subject before you shoot off about something you obviously have no idea about next time"
Right, I just read those two pages. Both are clearly written from a marketing perspective. Both claim that RSS feeds and Blogs are an untaped resource for endless riches.Matrix wrote:Actually i did read up about it before i posted:
http://www.internetmarketinghere.com/RSS-Index.html
http://www.stampedesecret.com/?hop=watersaffl
Maybe he's wrong, or maybe i understood it wrong, but you could maybe be a bit more polite ?
I don't expect everyone to know about RSS - that's why I included the "RSS?" option in the poll in the first place.Matrix wrote:If you could see that 3 ppl ticked "what is RSS on the poll" why didnt you explain sooner... ? It's quite arrogant to expect everybody knows what you know.
...at forum members, simply putting them right is enough without the insult.shouting your mouth off
Eh... I just read through two webpages of marketing-speak trying to pass RSS of as snake oil in order to better inform you of any shortcomings of the sourcematerial you originally quoted - as per your own request.Matrix wrote:Fair enough then, so i misunderstood, SORRY, was just trying to help, after all, you werent offering up any assistance were you.
Eh... That's quoting out of context and you know it.Matrix wrote:- Maybe you should work on it a little harder then in the future before......at forum members, simply putting them right is enough without the insult.shouting your mouth off