NEW SID 6581 & 6580 release~!

naughtyboy · Post by **naughtyboy** » 04/08/2005 - 15:55

Wow this sure has blossomed nicely hehe...

Does anyone haev anything else to say about the orginal sid/gameboy stuff?

Thanx,

-naughtyboy
http://www.8bitweapon.com

Analog-X64 · Post by **Analog-X64** » 04/08/2005 - 16:26

This topic is good I like it. I like the fact that M.A.F is expressing he's opinions and so is everyone else.

Chris Abbott · Post by **Chris Abbott** » 04/08/2005 - 17:41

I like the fact that M.A.F is expressing he's opinions and so is everyone else.

I hate the fact that I like the fact that you like the fact that M.A.F. is expressing his opinions and so is everyone else. That's my opinion.

Chris

Or is it?

naughtyboy · Post by **naughtyboy** » 04/08/2005 - 20:28

Who asked you!? lolol

-naughtyboy

http://www.8bitweapon.com

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 05/08/2005 - 1:52

Well as all good things have to come to and end,let me say that its been the most intresting post i have ever made. Response wise its been great.
thanks.
Many good replys have been received from some good people.

Others have though,as expected taken the pith...thats pith(i dont want to swear again).

God forbid any newcomers to this scene via remix64 having high hopes of ever being part of the "in" crowd.

(if any newcomers to this scene are watching this(there might be a couple) for goodness sake,dont do anything good.Dont do a remix that could be slightly better than what has been on offer in the past and definatley dont submit a remix to RKO or Amigaremix(doesnt matter which site you submit to to be honest) that is so good as to force the "established" "remixers" to "rebel" and try to belittle what you did better than they have shown in which that they might have possibly might have been ably to possibly do but they didnt because they didnt have your "amateur" train of "remixing" thought in the first place..

Having said that( and trying to exclude all brackets,but hey look ive done it again with the brackets

) they are all still a good bunch of lads.
Just rememmber to scratch their backs..often...no matter what "they" release as "remixes"...you MUST always remmember to scratch their backs.

Goodnight and god bless.

(sorry..i edited it because i forgot to put a p sorry t in the word "thought" above..anymore mistakes spotted please email me

)

Analog-X64 · Post by **Analog-X64** » 05/08/2005 - 2:42

hhehe I consider myself a newcomer and look at the date I joined 07 Dec 2002

Post by **tas** » 05/08/2005 - 14:32

All i can say about this thread is that it's been a long time coming really

We havn't had as much descussion in a long long time with altering points of views.

Great post M.A.F

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 06/08/2005 - 1:03

Analog-X wrote:hhehe I consider myself a newcomer and look at the date I joined 07 Dec 2002

Just back from the pub.

Analogue-X dont expect a reply from me friend.

...ooh bugger.......

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 06/08/2005 - 1:06

Tas wrote:All i can say about this thread is that it's been a long time.

You are so right mate

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 07/08/2005 - 3:06

Tas (aka neil)

Still got the email you sent me in 2002 commenting on one of the tunes i sent you.

Might scan it and try to post or just "copy" it from the original and put it out online.(doesnt sound very "remix64" i know)copying things musicwise can be an issue but its just an email you sent me,word for word,so should be ok

Might do Glyns 2002 email comments aswell.

Might do if i can find the email

Post by **tas** » 07/08/2005 - 3:28

2002 LOL!

i vaguely remember it too although i don't have the e-mail i sent you. Yeah mate, do owt with it, i don't mind

Was i nice?

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 07/08/2005 - 23:17

Tas wrote:2002 LOL!

i vaguely remember it too although i don't have the e-mail i sent you. Yeah mate, do owt with it, i don't mind

Was i nice?

Nah you weren't very nice atall mate.

You were just more professional then.

Post by **tas** » 08/08/2005 - 0:12

M.A.F · Post by **M.A.F** » 08/08/2005 - 0:19