That sounds like a best case scenario to me!omoroca wrote: For instance, DjUnz! could state: "I'm not trying to sound like IR."
Or DHS could state: "Omoroca mind your wording in this particular comment! I don't think he's trying to sound like IR, that's just your personal feeling!"
And then I could respond: "You guys are right, I've slightly changed the shout in order to reflect this."
And then the whole issue is settled within a couple of hours and there's no more need to discuss this weeks later any more.
Worst case, it could just go on and on and on! I think it's best to keep it simple and give the remixer the chance to just clarify what may not be obvious to every listener from the outset.For years there was a review of my Palace Gardens loader remix by Lala (don't know where it disappeared to, actually...), where I was eventually accused of being lazy for making yet another SID and drums remix. In fact, this couldn't have been further from the truth. I had built every C64 style sound from scratch with my Cheetah MS6 synth module and programmed in every note and pitch bend with Octamed (I never used SID2MIDI), which took a bloody long time!
I knew this, Lala didn't, so it was just a simple misunderstanding. However, it would have been great to just add a short response stating the facts and defending my percieved laziness.
Same goes for the remix which was the cause of this thread. I personally wouldn’t know trance if it came and bit me on the arse, but I can understand the frustration that may be felt if a negative comment is based on an untruth/misunderstanding.
I think an Ebay style one-liner response system to shouts or reviews would be just enough to just get the facts straight, without causing pages of arguments.
Do we allow countercountershouts and countercountercountershouts andcountercountercountercountershouts etc...? 
