![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Anyway welcome!
![Cheers :cheers:](./images/smilies/sm_cheers.gif)
This is 100% incorrect. Photographing copyrighted work amounts to reproducing it. The only reason you are allowed to take pictures is that the Louvre allows it (for private use only). They have restricted other works of Van Gogh and Gauguin (in a connecting room) with the "No photography” warnings.
You need to agree on those rights with every single original composer or copyright holder first. Good luck with that.
Pheew... LMan.So it's fair game to go after youtubers monetizing your music, but I have the strong inkling that a license info won't stop them.
That's just not right. You have always own rights as an editor on your work which has nothing to do with the copyrights.You need to agree on those rights with every single original composer or copyright holder first. Good luck with that.
When we talk about Good luck, then good luck with this site. Because it 100% illegal then! There is no fair use in german rights and this site is german.In a remix, the individual voices or soundtracks of an existing recording are reassembled or mixed, ergo "remixed". In this case, it usually remains with the already existing first recording, so that no new sound carrier and accordingly no further sound recording manufacturer right arises. In a remix, an original recording is usually underlaid with new tracks and is thus a processing of the original recording. The author (in particular composer, lyricist) or representative of his music publisher must therefore be asked for his consent. Since the original recording is used, it also requires the permission of the record company that has published the original title.
I am an Editor. You can call this C64 Editors if you want to talk about RIGHT or not RIGHT.Cover versions, however, are the subject of copyright, which is described in Germany in the Copyright Act (UrhG). Legally, the cover version is always a "different transformation" in the sense of the UrhG. This also applies if it is replayed true to the original. The Federal Supreme Court describes as a cover version the re-recording of a processing of an original work, while the music industry sees in the cover version of the re-production and release of a previously existing and already published musical work.
Ideally, a cover version is not an editing, but a faithful use of the original. The rights to use a cover version may be obtained from the collecting society of the original. Minor changes through another arrangement are covered by the purpose of the UrhG. Significant changes, however, would be an editing. Example: A German lyrics to a foreign-language original is editing.
Of copyright importance is the question of whether the new version is an almost complete match with the original or whether its own creative achievement exists. In the last case, musically, it's not a cover version, but an adaptation.
Nice.poke16384 wrote: ↑<span class="hotdate" style="color:#888;">03/08/2019 - 14:20</span> Just to prove that making a copyright claim does work:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huEUOPDPbgQ
It was a BIG long playlist of remixes from remix64, (mine included obvs)...